|
In the Samizdat Tradition of Writing against the Machine |
|
What a blessed world of snivelling nobodies we live in! Oil of vitriol must be applied. —Ralph Waldo Emerson
The Canon A group of men dictates Mister X to be the finest writer of the past few decades. That group with quite similar tastes and aesthetics, as well as parallel apathy to engagement, both social and political, draws others to it like chicken to feed, pigs to troughs, or cows to bales of hay. Its opinion permeates increasingly like an oil spill into a harbor or fumes into a town or city propagated by a member of the chamber of commerce. Its opinion hardens more and more like adipose deposits in arteries or a viagara-induced erection until it appears as if objective and none dare otherwise contest it, well, almost none…
Oil of Vitriol Besides excellence—oh, but of course!—, the editors often boast, in chorus, how open they are to style, theme, and subject matter. One of them, however, wrote with evident scornful implication and close-mindedness to my chosen theme, if not style, that there was a difference between vigorous debate and vitriol or slander. Yet nobody had ever sued me for defamation; while for the other denigration, a Chief Justice* had argued convincingly that the First Amendment was designed to invite dispute, induce a conditionof unrest, and even stir people to anger. But unlike the First, that editor’s magazine was, in the Chief ’s own words, fashioned as a vehiclefor dispensing tranquilizers to the people. * Chief Justice William O. Douglas also noted that the “prime function” of the First “was to keep debate open to ‘offensive’ as well as to ‘staid’ people.”
Lovers of Poetry The nation is overrun with editors and vast quantities of poetry magazines, one indistinguishable from the next, few at all having a distinct focus other than poesy for the sake of poesy, as if the genre’s intrinsic purpose were to entertain and divert the populace. Yet Villon, Saro-Wiwa, Jeffers, and others —not that many, of course—would have argued poetry to be potentially much more than wit and verb in the court of power. You champion an important topic, but forget there’s a whole world out there full of people who just love poetry, argued an editor.Yet his actions and the reality of his fairly large publication prove the topic not pertinent for him. Nor have I forgotten that indeed a whole world of people out there love anything the giant media corporations decide to spin
from Brittney Spears to, of course, poetry. Our Leaders These masters of doublespeak and other convoluted jabber aren’t very convincing at all.
ALL MATERIAL ON THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT ©G. Tod Slone, 2010, The American Dissident www.theamericandissident.org, a 501c3 nonprofit. |