|
In the Samizdat Tradition of Writing against the Machine |
|
Bennett College (Greensboro, NC)—Free Speech in Peril Bennett College The possession of power unavoidably corrupts the free exercise of reason. —Immanuel Kant
Institutions of higher education are conducted for the common good and not to further the interest of either the individual teacher or the institution as a whole. The common good depends upon the free search for truth and its free exposition.
I am really trying to make clear the nature of the artist's responsibility to his society. The peculiar nature of this responsibility is that he must never cease warring with it, for its sake and for his own.
We must not, contrary to your advice, simply forget the “baggage”, but rather learn from it, analyze it, and, yes, decry it. How else might we arrest the increasing decay crippling our civilization? The little caesars, that is, the “baggage”, who impede our lives and putrefy our society are there to enhance our awareness of the potential shabbiness of human behavior and increase our desire to eliminate such behavior. To forget and leave behind “those little sh..s,” as, I believe, you used to refer to them, is to not only permit them to thrive but also to dismiss reality and in so doing allow our institutions to further deteriorate into a sham of happy-face fascism. To hold on to old “baggage” is not necessarily to carry around a burden of hatred and anger, as you seemed to imply. Personally, my “baggage” has been a marvelous source of creativity. It has provoked me to write 900 pages of essays, hundreds of poems, six novels, and one play, as well as to sketch several hundred sociopolitical cartoons and to create a literary journal devoted to “baggage”.
The breaches in logic, increasingly rampant in academe, are troubling because illogical reasoning is being inculcated in the minds of students, future leaders of the nation. Ideology and orthodoxy (e.g., political correctness) always result in illogical reasoning. What I found truly troubling at that Forum was not simply the illogical reasoning of the student panelists but the applause of the faculty and administrators present. How does a student learn to develop a corrupt system of logic, if not from the latter? The two most egregious examples of corrupted logic manifested during that Forum include: 1. it is wonderful to have gotten rid of segregation and it is wonderful to voluntarily want to attend a racially segregated college and 2. black women are not obese because they are compared statistically to the body structures of white men. To my utter amazement, most of the audience indeed applauded that aberrant reasoning with regards obesity. Recall what the senior class president, one of the panelists, had proudly declared: “Obesity is not a problem at Bennett College!” I do hope her deviant reasoning does not reflect that of the entire senior class. I do wish that you would take a careful look at the weight problem here on campus… for the sake of student health.
On another note, during your speech, you singled out white men as having greater privileges and opportunities in America. I felt a little uncomfortable when you made that statement. However, I do not deny its statistical veracity. Nevertheless, it constitutes a breach in your logic regarding “baggage”. Are you carrying around “baggage” with regards white men? No matter. The point I wish to make is that on the macro scale of things, today successful fiduciary acquisition (to put it nicely) eclipses skin color in America as criteria for privilege and opportunity. People of money, including Afro-Americans Oprah, Michael Jordan, Coretta Scott King, the limousine poet Maya Angelou, and you, have far greater privileges and opportunities than people who do not have money, white or black. Think of the privilege that you have as a person of means and power: the bully pulpit! Would not the News & Record publish anything you or one of yours submitted? Enclosed is the Op Ed just rejected by the News & Record. Note it constitutes an alternative view regarding the large front-page spread and various editorials regarding you. How can we be content knowing that our local newspaper will not publish less than flattering critique of local leaders? Why does the News & Record refuse, categorically, to print anything less than toadying in scope regarding you? I find that quite troubling. We all should find that quite troubling. But do we?
|